EBCO - European Bureau for Conscientious Objection

[Newsletter] [Statistics] [Contact Information] [E-mail]

Home News Country Reports Documents Events Member Organizations & Links Who is who Members Archive

 
   

     
     
Welcome to the website of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection. We are happy to see you as guest, please step in and have a look.

For the latest developments concerning conscientious objection in Europe, you can click on our map and see more details in the table below.

If you want to contact our national members click on the map or see the list below or open the Member
organizations & links page .

For more information about individual cases check our
News page.

For more detailed reports and background information open the
Document or Country reports page
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You find the latest issue of our Newsletter "The right to refuse to kill"
when you
click here. (For older copies see our section "Newsletter")
   
     
EBCO Web Carte d'Europe

1)
green = no conscription
Bosnis-Herzegovina, Croatia,
Great Britain, Ireland, France, Spain, Italy, Malta, Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Luxembourg, Belgium, Netherlands, Iceland, Slovenia, Macedonia, Portugal
2) yellow = Conscientious objection fairly recognized
Germany, Austria, Sweden, Denmark, Latvia . Lithuania , Norwegen-Norway, Switzerland, Serbia
3) orange = Conscientious recognized but discriminatory
Cyprus, Greece, Russian Federation, Ukraine, Estonia, Finland, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Albania, Poland, Montenegro
4) red = Conscientious objection not recognized
Belarus, Azerbaijan, Turkey (including Northern Cyprus)
 

   

 [ + ]

January 2010

BELARUS

Six months of arrest for the right to alternative civilian service?

A 21-year-old Ivan Mikhajlau charged with draft evasion (according to Art. 435 of the Criminal Code of Belarus) is facing a threat of six months of arrest. Ivan does not consider himself an “evader” from the draft – he was ready to be enrolled into alternative civilian service instead of military. However, the recruitment commission denied him such a possibility.

According to the lawyer Svyatlana Harbatok, her client’s family, referring to Art. 57 of the Constitution of the Republic of Belarus and CIS Model Law “On Alternative (non-military) Service”, repeatedly addressed the draft commission, military enlistment office, Ministry of Defence and the president’s administration with a request to substitute military service for Ivan Mikhajlau by alternative or reserves service. Alternative service would be a preferable option for this young man, since he is the elder son in a family with many children and substantially supports the family. Besides, Ivan is a parishioner of Messianic Jews community. His religious views ban him to bear arms.

It should be noted that according to Art. 36 of the Belarusian Law “On Military Duty and Military Service”, the draft commission, among other functions, adopts decisions about assigning a person to alternative service. The draft commission of Minsk region disregarded the situation explained by Mikhajlau’s family and decided to send Ivan for a full term military service.

The case was forwarded to the court of Minsk region on December 31, 2009, however, the date of the court trial has not been set yet. Meanwhile the young man has been in the remand prison of Zhodzina for three weeks.

Mikhajlau’s case will be third over a recent period among a series of cases “on alternative service”. Thus, on November 6, 2009, 23-year-old Dzmitry Smyk (resident of Homiel) was found guilty of draft evasion and sentenced for a heavy fine. Another young man from Homiel – now a soldier – Andrei Tsianuta, is waiting for a decision of a district court regarding his appeal. Human rights defenders assume that the main reason for an increase of number of similar cases is in the lack of legislation on alternative civilian service.

Monitoring group of the Campaign “For Alternative Civilian Service in Belarus” AGS.BY

NB. Right to alternative civilian service instead of the military service is ensured by the Belarusian Constitution in its Art. 57. In 2000,
Constitutional Court
considered necessary to adopt the law regulating alternative civilian service at shortest terms. However, the draft law was rejected by the Chamber of Representatives of the Belarusian Parliament in 2004. In 2009, a draft of the Law “On Alternative Service” was included into a draft of Presidential Edict “On legislative activity in 2010”. The Edict itself, publicized several days ago, did not contain the mentioned draft law as such.

Mikhas` Pashkevich, Minsk

12 January 2010
   
     
Open letter to the Government of the Republic of Turkey

Stop the harrassment of Turkish conscientious objector Enver AYDEMIR!


The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection in Brussels requests the immediate end of the harrassment of the Turkish conscientious objector Enver AYDEMIR who has been arrested on 24 December at the ferry port in Kabatas,, I.stanbul on his way to the conscientious objection conference held in Bog(aziçi University where he was to be a panelist. He was first taken to the Dog(anc?lar police station and then to a military police station. Later that evening he was taken to court, arrested and temporarily sent to the Maltepe Military Prison. This is the same military prison where former conscientious objector I.smail Sayg? was beaten very badly back in 2008.


Enver Aydemir couldn't receive legal support until Saturday (December 26th) when lawyer Davut Erkan visited him in Maltepe military prison. Davut Erkan reported that Enver was beaten upon first entering the prison on Thursday evening because he refused wearing the military uniform. He was then stripped of his own clothing and kept in his underwear in the cold until the next morning. In protest of this mistreatment Enver went on a hunger strike. He was beaten the other day again by an army officer and forcefully put in a military prison uniform.


The Turkish army is threatning democratic values insted of protecting them. The European Charter for Fundamental Rights has been signed by the Turkish Prime Minister. It enshrines in Article 10 the right to conscientious objection.

We request the immediate release of Enver Aydemir.

Alexia Tsouni, Secretary General Gerd Greune, President
   
     
November 2009

ATHENS, Greece -- The Defence Ministry announced on Friday (November 6th) that it will abolish mandatory naval marine and air force service in 2012 in an effort to limit defence costs. Defence Minister Evangelos Venizelos said that in the transit period, these two units of the armed forces will be looking for recruits with special skills, including doctors and chemical engineers. Military service in Greece is mandatory for all men aged between 18 and 45. (Kathimerini - 07/11/09; AP - 06/11/09)
   
     
Conscience and Peace Tax International (CPTI) and the Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva joined forces to bring conscientious objectors from Colombia, Israel and Russia to the 97th Session of the UN Human Rights Committee, which started on 12th October. EBCO's representative in Russia Andrey Kalikh gave the following report:


Implementation of the right to conscientious objection in Russian Federation 2004 ¨C 2009

Since the previous Fifth Periodical Report of the Russian Federation has been submitted to the Committee¡¯s consideration in 2003, the right for conscientious objection has been institutionalized in Russia. The law on alternative civilian service came into effect in 2004. The objectors have gained the possibility to substitute civilian service for military service, however the law on the civilian service is still far from ideal.

In conclusion observations on the Fifth Periodical Report of the Russian Federation the UN Committee for Human Rights wrote: ¡°While the Committee welcomes the introduction of the possibility for conscientious objectors to substitute civilian service for military service, it remains concerned that the Alternative Civilian Service Act, which will take effect on 1 January 2004, appears to be punitive in nature by prescribing civil service of a length 1.7 times that of normal military service. Furthermore, the law does not appear to guarantee that the tasks to be performed by conscientious objectors are compatible with their convictions. The State party should reduce the length of civilian service to that of military service and ensure that its terms are compatible with articles 18 and 26 of the Covenant¡±.

The main task of this brief is to establish whether any changes in the legislation on the CO have been undertaken by the government in order to use the Committee¡¯s recommendations of 2003 and to improve legal position of conscientious objectors.

A reduction of the length of military service and the length of civilian service by half in 2008 has been a very positive step forward. Conscript military service has been reduced from 24 to 12 months and alternative civilian service is reduced from 42 months to 21. For those performing the civilian service in organizations under military jurisdiction the duration of service is reduced from 36 to 18 months. The length of civilian service became shorter than military service was two years ago. Before 2007, as the reduction started step by step, the length of the civilian service was 42 months, being the longest in the world.

Nevertheless, while the length of civilian service is reduced, it has not been changed in relation to military service and remains 1.75 times that of normal military service as before.

Another positive issue remains is the possibility for higher education by extramural correspondence courses during the service; military servicemen are deprived of this right.

In spite of some positive developments, many issues of the law and its implementation still excite concern, such as:

Deliberate tangled bureaucratic application procedure. Applications should be submitted to military draft commissariats six months before the draft, while the potential civilian serviceman could be still a minor. Many cases reported of the denial of civilian service by formal reasons, such as failure to comply the terms of application. Military draft commissariats often illegally reject to accept applications using deception, misinformation or even threats.

According to the Federal Labor and Employment Service ¨C agency responsible to organize alternative civilian service, the draft commissions approve 78 per cent of applications; other applications are denied under different reasons. Many applicants are denied on the ground that they were unable to prove their convictions; however the law does not require to prove one¡¯s convictions, but to ground them.

Performance of the alternative civilian service is still possible only in state organizations under federal jurisdiction or of local self-government bodies. There is still no opportunity to perform the civilian service in municipal or non-governmental organizations, which makes considerably more difficult to use the work of alternative servicemen in the social sphere.

Performance is still possible in organizations under jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense. Usually the decision is to be taken by the Federal Labor and Employment Service without taking applicant¡¯s wishes into consideration. This remains highly relevant, even though their salaries in organizations under military jurisdiction are considerably higher than those in social organizations and the length of the service is shorter. This rule often contradicts the convictions of a citizen. As the result, part of the citizens evade performance of the service and become criminally liable.

Many citizens who opted for alternative civil service allocated to positions where salaries are considerably lower than subsistence level (mainly this is the case with hospitals, disabled persons homes and other social service organizations). At the same time the law forbids the persons who are in the alternative civilian service to take up part-time jobs on the side. Thereby the citizens who undergo alternative civilian service are being discriminated in comparison with the military conscripts who are being provided for fully by the state.

An important issue is the hampered access to information on alternative civilian service. Agencies responsible for alternative civilian service, as well as the media, do not provide potential performer with information sufficiently or even hide or distort it. Propaganda campaign in the media mainly initiated by the Ministry of Defense, which is afraid to lose its monopoly for young men, shows the civilian service in negative light. MoD officials in their interviews to the state media often describe civilian service as very special service, assigned only for religious objectors. The service is sometimes negatively described in the media comments as ¡°dirty work¡± in social organizations (which is considered as a most unpopular kind of jobs), which is ¡°not for real men¡±. Applicants are often shown as ¡°sectarians¡±, ¡°egoists¡±, ¡°cowards¡± or ¡°deserters evading military service¡±. As a result, the popularity of civilian service decreased strongly in the last years.

According to the law, citizens perform their service, ¡°mainly outside of the subjects of the Russian Federation, where they are permanent residents¡± ¨C exterritorial rule. This artificial obstacle has only one explanation: Ministry of Defense, which is insisted to introduce this paragraph, is convinced that conditions for civilian servicemen should be not softer than for military ones. This obstacle harms all parties involved in civilian service implementation: performers, employers, authorities.

The same refers for another artificial restriction: performer is not allowed to leave the settlement where his place of work is, without employer¡¯s permit.

Mostly those persons integrated in consolidated and experienced groups, can access to alternative civilian service: according to the Federal Labor and Employment Service, 80 percent of citizens are approved for civilian service on religious grounds ¨C most of them are Jehovah¡¯s Witnesses and other religious associations. Only 15 percent of persons are approved because of other convictions. Five percent are the representatives of constituted ¡®numerically small indigenous peoples¡¯ of Russia.

The result of these shortcomings is decreased number of performers, from approximately 1400 applicants in the first military draft as civilian service started in 2004, to 269 in the military draft autumn 2009 (according to the Federal Labor and Employment Service).

Recommendations for improvement of the law on alternative civilian service and its implementation:

1. The length of the alternative civilian service should be reduced in relation to that of military service so, that it would be not punitive and discriminatory for conscientious objectors;

2. Performance of civilian service in organizations under military jurisdiction should be voluntary, on consent of performer;

3. Ministry of Defense should be completely removed from those agencies manage civilian service, which should be administrated only by civilian authorities (e.g. Federal Labor and Employment Service);

4. The application procedure should be simplified; the rule of the term of six months before the draft for submission of applications to military draft commissariats should be removed;

5. The right to choose the sphere and type of labor activity (from the ones in the list of organizations, professions and positions) can be enforced without changes in the legislation. The law does not prohibit the agency responsible for organizing the alternative civil service (the Federal Labor and Employment Service) to take into consideration citizen¡¯s requests concerning a particular place for alternative civil service;

6. The exterritorial rule of performing civilian service should be removed;

7. The restriction to leave the place of work should be abolished;

8. Assignment of the civilian service performers in positions with salaries lower than subsistence level should be prohibited.

Submitted in October 2009 by Andrey Kalikh and Lev Levinson

Members of the Secretariat of the Russian NGO Coalition

For a Democratic Alternative Civilian Service¡±

Web-site:
http://ags.demokratia.ru (in Russian)

Andrey Kalikh

Program coordinator

Centre for Development of Democracy and Human Rights

Moscow, Russia

E-mail:
akalikh@yandex.ru

Web-site:
http://demokratia.ru



In the autumn sunlight of the Quaker House garden at the completion of the programme.

From left to right: Andrey Kalikh (Russia), Klaus Talaverano (Spanish interpreter),

Holly Mason-White (QUNO), Deybi Cuesta (Colombia), Haggai Matar (Israel), Danna Frank (Israel),

and Rachel Brett (QUNO). Photo by Derek Brett (CPTI).
   
     
European Court of Human Rights fails to uphold international human rights standards

I an joint statement the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection, the Quaker United Nations Office, Geneva, and the War Resisters' International criticized the ECtHR Third section judgement Bayatyan v. Armenia (Application no. 23459/03, 27/10/09) on the occasion of a study session held in Budapest 25 October to 1 November 2009


In the case of a Jehovah's Witness who was sentenced to two and a half years in prison following his refusal of military service on the grounds of conscientious objection, a Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has stated categorically that conscientious objection to military service is not protected under the European Convention on Human Rights.

In the judgement, the Chamber appeared, in its interpretation of Article 9 of the European Convention, to overlook the international human rights standards and jurisprudence . The United Nations Human Rights Committee addressed precisely the same issues in relation to the equivalent provision of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in the case of Yeo-Bum Yoon and Myung-Jin Choi vs Republic of Korea[1]. In that case (January 2007) the Human Rights Committee specifically interpreted Article 18 of the International Covenant (the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion[2]) as protecting conscientious objection to military service.

The Human Rights Committee stated that the reference in Article 8 para 3 of the International Covenant to “any service of a military character and, in countries where conscientious objection is recognised, any national service required by law of conscientious objectors” as exceptions to the prohibition of forced labour “itself neither recognises nor excludes a right of conscientious objection”. By contrast the Chamber judgement claims that the equivalent provision on forced labour in the European Convention[3] trumps the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion in this respect, even stating that States are not prevented from punishing conscientious objectors.

It is important that the Grand Chamber agrees to hear an appeal in order to bring the
European Court's position in line with international jurisprudence.

Budapest, 1 November 2009

The full text of the statement can be seen here: (pdf-file)



[1]Yeo-Bum Yoon y Myung-Jin Choi vs Republic of Korea (CCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004, 23 January 2007)

[2]Article 18 of the ICCPR is the equivalent of Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

“1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.

2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.

3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.”

Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights:

“1. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

2. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs shall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of public order, health or morals, or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.”

[3]Article 8 para 3 of the ICCPR:

“(a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;

(b) Paragraph 3 (a) shall not be held to preclude, in countries where imprisonment with hard labour may be imposed as a punishment for a crime, the performance of hard labour in pursuance of a sentence to such punishment by a competent court;

(c) For the purpose of this paragraph the term "forced or compulsory labour" shall not include:

(...)

(ii) Any service of a military character and, in countries where conscientious objection is recognized, any national service required by law of conscientious objectors;”

Article 4 para 2 and 3 (b) of the European Convention of Human Rights:

“2. No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour.

3. For the purpose of this article the term forced or compulsory labour' shall not include:

(...)

(b) any service of a military character or, in case of conscientious objectors in countries where they are recognized, service exacted instead of compulsory military service;”
   
     
Nazi deserter hails long-awaited triumph

By Tristana Moore (BBC News, Berlin) 8 September 2009


For almost 20 years, Ludwig Baumann has been fighting for justice, determined to clear the names of all victims of Nazi military justice.


Ludwig Baumann was sentenced
to death by the Nazis


After a long struggle, on Tuesday, the German parliament revoked the convictions of the last group of victims, those condemned as "war traitors," more than 60 years after the end of World War II.

Ludwig Baumann joined Hitler's Wehrmacht when he was 19, but he became a pacifist and in June 1942, he deserted, along with his friend Kurt Oldenburg, while they were deployed in France.

"I didn't want to take part in Hitler's war," Ludwig Baumann told the BBC.

"I realised it was a criminal and genocidal war," he said.

Despite his fearlessness, Mr Baumann was caught by the Nazis and sentenced to death for desertion. He was tortured, taken to concentration camps, and was lucky to avoid being executed.

"We were sentenced to death in Bordeaux. We were tortured while they kept us because we refused to tell the Nazis the names of our friends who helped us
- the French resistance fighters," said Mr Baumann.

"After 10 months we were taken to a concentration camp and then to Torgau, a huge Wehrmacht prison. Around 1,300 of our people were shot dead or died there - and then we were taken to the Eastern Front.

"Most of our men died, including my friend Kurt Oldenburg. I managed to survive," he added.

Fight for dignity

After the war, Baumann says he faced abuse from many Germans who accused him of cowardice. The 87-year-old's conviction for desertion was among those finally annulled by the German parliament in 2002. But those people convicted of what the Nazis described as "wartime treason" were excluded from this ruling.



L'Allemagne réhabilite ses "traîtres de guerre"

64 ans après la fin de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale, les "traîtres de guerre" obtiennent réparation
Deutsche Welle 8 septembre 2009
   
     
The right of Conscientious Objection is enshrined in Article 10 of the Charter for Fundamental Rights of the European Union.


Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR MEP

EBCO handed on 30 September 2009 the Annual Report 2008 on Conscientious Objection to the Chairman of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home affairs of the European Parliament Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR. The report has been prepared by Derek Brett and Alexia Tsouni and has been delivered by EBCO's representative Girogos Kosmopoulos.

EBCO-letter_to_the_chairman_LIB_Committee.pdf

EBCO-public-statemenet-2008-report.pdf

EBCO-2008-report.pdf
   
     
September 2009

WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES calls for

The right of conscientious objection to military service

1. The World Council of Churches (WCC) and other civil society organizations urged the United Nations in 1973 to recognize conscientious objection to military service as “a valid expression of the right of freedom of conscience” and make alternative means of service available to conscientious objectors. The Statement on the Question of Conscientious Objection to Military Service from 1973 says that the WCC and its partner organizations “believe that the time has come for the Commission (on Human Rights) to take a decisive step towards the international recognition of the right of conscientious objection to military service”. Four considerations were cited as a basis for that belief: growing concern among religious communities, respect for the right to freedom of thought and for the integrity of the individual, the role of youth in promoting peace, and the fact that the lack of alternatives to armed service leads to a waste of human resources and prison terms of young people with deeply held convictions.

2. Succeeding years have seen recognition granted in international forums and a UN covenant on civil and political rights. The ecumenical movement, through the Conciliar Process for Justice, Peace and the Integrity of Creation, leading up to the 1990, Seoul, Korea Convocation on JPIC, reaffirmed the right to conscientious objection. As a result, conscientious objection to military service in principle has reached new levels of protection under the freedoms of thought and religion, as well as freedom of conscience.

3. A report by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in 2006, however, revealed serious shortfalls in many countries in recognizing and exercising the right to conscientious objection to military service and found that conscientious objectors are often subject to penalization, discrimination and imprisonment. The WCC central committee then called for a study in the light of that report.

4. The WCC study shows that in many places churches face challenges of conscientious objection. Their responses include initiatives to support conscientious objectors in some countries. Three observations provide an overview of church positions on the issue: Historic Peace Churches strongly encourage their members to refuse participation in any military actions. Meanwhile, they respect the freedom of the individual decision. Other churches consider that both civilian service and military service may be Christian options. Finally, while many, and perhaps most churches, do not have an official position on the issue, the study found no evidence of these churches speaking against conscientious objection.

5. The study suggests that a consensus position among churches is to affirm the right of conscientious objection so that individuals who feel they cannot bear weapons for religious or other reasons of conscience should have the possibility to object without being submitted to discrimination or punishment.

6. It is also noted that in some countries where there is a right to conscientious objection to military service, some Christians have become sensitive to the use of their tax money for supporting war, and in some cases have faced government action against them because of their conscientious objection to paying for war. This development of conscientious objection deserves further study and consideration.

7. 7. As the Decade to Overcome Violence affirms the biblical foundations, especially as expressed in the Sermon on the Mount: The merciful, the peacemakers and the persecuted are blessed in the Beatitudes; and Jesus teaches love even for one’s enemies (Matthew 5: 6-9).

Therefore, the central committee of the WCC, meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, 26 August - 2 September 2009:

A. Reiterates existing WCC policy and reaffirms its support for the human right of conscientious objection for religious, moral or ethical reasons in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and other international laws, as churches have an obligation to support those who refuse to take part in violence.

B. Calls upon WCC member churches, wherever they are in a position to do so, to uphold the right of refusal to bear and use arms and to encourage church members to uphold that right as well.

C. Deplores the situation that men, women and children in many parts of the world are forced into armed service under governments and also under non-governmental forces or paramilitary organizations.

D. Encourages member churches to address their respective governments and military organizations to recognize and honour conscientious objection to military service as a human right under international law.

E. Calls upon churches to encourage their members to object to military service in situations when the church considers armed action illegal or immoral.

F. Encourages churches to study and address the issue of military or war taxes and of alternatives to military service.

G. Calls upon all Christians to pray for peace, abandon violence and seek peace through nonviolent means.

Full text of the 2009 study "
The Right of Conscientious Objection to Military Service", prepared for the WCC Central Committee by the office of the WCC Decade to Overcome Violence.
   
     
August 2009

AZERBAIJAN
Concluding observations of the United Nations Human Rights Committee 3 Aug 2009

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE / Ninety-sixth session / 13 – 31 July 2009

CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
CCPR/C/AZE/CO/3 / 3 August 2009


14. The Committee remains concerned that no legal provision regulates
the status of conscientious objectors to military service (art. 18).

The Committee recommends that a law exempting conscientious objectors
from compulsory military service and providing for alternative civil
service of equivalent length be adopted at an early date in compliance
with article 18 of the Covenant and the Committee's General Comment No. 22.

Source:
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/co/CCPR.C.AZE.CO.3.doc
   
     
US AWOL Soldier André Shepherd Needs Asylum !

A Declaration on Anti-War Day, 2009

André Shepherd went AWOL and applied for asylum in Germany in November of 2008. With this act André set himself against the current of war and occupation policies of the United States, policies that have led to suffering, destruction and death in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries across the globe. André Shepherd, an Apache attack helicopter mechanic in Iraq, chose to walk away from further military service: “I knew that continued participation would mean that I would be responsible for the violation of human rights. For that reason the path ahead of me was clear: I had to leave the military.” While André served only in Iraq, he makes it clear that “the atrocities in Afghanistan should not be downplayed. If President Obama really wants to make a change, he needs to bring an end to the War on Terror in its' entirety.”

In his application for asylum, André Shepherd appeals to the Qualifications Directive of the European Union, which has had legal power since October of 2006. Under this ruling, protection is guaranteed to those who refuse participation in war or actions which violate human rights, and for this refusal face persecution and punishment.

In light of the consequences for his stance, Andrés' decision is a sign of great courage. For his choice, André faces criminal prosecution and the possibility of multiple years behind bars. Furthermore, deserters of the US military receive a dishonorable discharge, a status that labels the individual not only as a traitor, but can also make the job search virtually impossible.

We emphasize that conscientious objection and desertion are courageous actions taken by the individual in order to resist further participation in war, war crimes, and systematic military violence. Saying no to war is an important step in bringing the war to an end.

On this day of opposition to the making of war, the undersigned groups express their support and solidarity with André Shepherd, who with his decision has taken decisive stance against the war. The organizations ask the Federal Government of Germany to grant André Shepherd asylum, and to protect those who conscientiously object to participating in wars contrary to the law of international human rights.

The signing groups would like to encourage others to take a stand and show support for the campaign of André Shepherd. More information can be found at the addresses at the bottom.



More information at
www.Connection-eV.de/en_index.php or www.mc-network.de,

ph.: +49-69-82375534 or +49-6223-47506
   
     
On 16 June 2009

Union Pacifiste de France (UPF) organised in presence of the film maker François Chouquet and former deserters from the Algerian war a

Public meeting in Paris with Deserters of the Algerian war


Showing the documentary
Comme un seul home (Like a single man)


Between 1957 and 1960, women and men worked together in the Civil non-violent action "Action civique non violente"(ACNV). They mobilised public opinion through hunger strikes to protest against the practice of torture and the establishment of concentration camps and in solidarity with those who refused to participate in this war ACNF organized with them the resistance.

2003, most of these deserters of the Algerian war and many of those in solidarity found themselves back in this film.
 

     


CYPRUS

EBCO GENERAL ASSEMBLY
AND PUBLIC ACTIVITIES


15-17 May 2009


The annual meeting of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection – EBCO took place on 16th May in Nicosia, with the participation of representatives from Cyprus, Russia, France, Germany, Italy, Holland, Belgium, Macedonia, Serbia, Britain, and Greece.

The meeting, hosted by the Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus, was held at the premises of the Turkish Cypriot Teachers’ Union (KTOS)

The situation in the Council of Europe member states regarding the right to conscientious objection, the struggle against militarism, peace and conflict resolution were evaluated and new members of the secretariat were elected. EBCO Cyprus Representative
Murat Kanatli was elected as one of the vice presidents. The other two vice-presidents newly elected were Dimitris Sotiropoulos and Derek Brett.

Gerd Greune and Alexia Tsouni were re-elected president and general secretary of EBCO respectively.

Gina Chappa and Murat Kanatli, our hosts in Cyprus

The representatives of conscientious objection organizations of various European countries who were in Cyprus for the EBCO meeting participated as speakers in various panel discussions, which were held in the southern and the northern part of the island.

Conscientious objection activities in Cyprus

The first of the activities of the Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus took place on 15th May at 19:00 hours in the southern part of Nicosia at the University of Cyprus. EBCO President Gerd Greune and EBCO General Secretary and activist of Amnesty International in Greece Alexia Tsouni spoke at the public meeting about the implementation of the legislation on conscientious objection by the Republic of Cyprus. An interested audience raised questions for more than two hours…

On Friday, 15th May, within the framework of the activities, Bandista, (www.tayfabandista.org) one of the most famous young music groups of Turkey, gave a concert at the Coskuner Beer Garden with the participation of a large group of young people… The Bandista group performed their songs throughout the night; the international delegation as well as the youth from both sides of Cyprus and the universities at the forefront and participants of different age groups sang along some of these songs…

On Saturday, 16th May, at 19:30, Gerd Greune and Alexia Tsouni participated
again as speakers at a public meeting at the northern part of Cyprusthat took place at the KTOS premises under the title “human rights and conscientious objection in international law”. Murat Kanatli also gave a presentation at the open discussion evaluating the latest situation in the northern part of Cyprus…

The press coverage in the northern part of Cyprus of the events was impressive. In the southern part the press agency gave a report.

Militourism in Nicosia

On Sunday, 17th May, the international EBCO group joined famous “militourism in Nicosia”. This activity was organized in Nicosia, similar to an activity realized earlier in Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir by anti-war and anti-militarist activists in Turkey. Militourism, derived from the “mili” of militarism and with the addition of tourism, was realized on both sides of Nicosia, well suited to its name.

The first activity was held in front of “Asal Sube” (the building where conscription takes place in the northern part of Czprus). In the first statement with the participation of activists of the Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus and the international delegation, it was stated that the situation on both sides of Cyprus is unacceptable and it was demanded that the right to conscientious objection should be recognized without any discrimination and according to international standards. Later, the Cypriot activists gave information to passers-by in front of the “Mehmetcik Gazinosu”, wh?ch belongs to the Turkish contingent in Cyprus (TURDIK), about the existing military structures in Cyprus. A statement prepared by the Initiative was read there. Later on, the same statement was read in front of the officers’ club which belongs to the Greek contingent (ELDIK.) The statement read in front of both military buildings was as follows:

The Occupation of Weapons

We live under the occupation of weapons. They are trying to crush our hopes under the boots of the soldiers who are dividing our island. We are in front of buildings that represent the armies who made us fight against each other in our country, where we could have lived as brothers and sisters.

Nicosia: Turc military camp

We have been living in fear since the day they came to our country. They imposed the tyrannical Juntas of their countries on us. First they made us fight against each other within the framework of their games and then they intervened with weapons and tanks in order to protect us. These armies not only deal with military interventions, but have also managed to have a say in all spheres of life through political games. They have placed their representatives with epaulets and weapons into the educational system, at the peace negotiations and the TV channels. They monitor how we live and they watch over our lives with weapons in their hands.

Hundreds of square kilometres of our land have become a training and battle area for soldiers from other countries. We have lived years of suffering due to the attacks and instigations of the guarantor countries under the pretext of protecting our republic where we hoped to live in peace. They brought to our island the machines that killed us. These “protectors” who thought that the machines they brought were not sufficient, provided the gangs here with death machines, trained them and made them fight against each other. Since the first day they came, they have organized assassinations of those people who struggled for freedom and peace and they are still continuing their attacks with oppression and threats.

It is now time for these fascist armies, who continuously remind us of their presence through military exercises and official ceremonies, to leave the island.

How safe can people and nature be under the protection of weapons? These weapons’ depots that are a threat to nature should immediately be sent back to their countries, and in return for all the suffering and sins committed, their weapons should be taken away and destroyed.

Nicosia
Backyard of a southern Cyprus house with a view on the UN controlled zone to the Turc side


We should build everything needed for peace with our own hands. Peace under the shadow of weaponry will again lead us to days of suffering. In order to raise our hopes during these days when negotiations for a solution are taking place, and to come one more step closer to peace, it is necessary to save ourselves from the “saviours” and to do away with guarantors. Although it may not be to the liking of those who do not want a solution, raising our struggle for peace everywhere on the island will lead us to better days.

In order to see the days where we can live in peace like brothers and sisters, we should start from liberating ourselves from these armies, so that we will never experience again the sufferings of war. Every weapon and soldier leaving from the island will provide us with peace, serenity, a green environment, and confidence; we believe this and that is why we shall continue our struggle.”

After the statement was read, the soldier keeping guard at the checkpoint was given a carnation and the walk continued…

The group then walked to the Fighters’ Premises (Mucahitler Sitesi) where the TMT museum is also housed. Here, Cypriot activists read statements about EOKA and TMT, the paramilitary organizations, established in the mid 1950’s. As a result of police harassment, who were trying to prevent the group taking pictures in front of the premises, the Initiative activists explained to the group that we live in a place where taking pictures in the street is not allowed and that 90% of the northern part of Cyprus is considered to be a military zone and warned them that when taking pictures to avoid, if possible (!) military areas.

Then another statement prepared by the Initiative was read here. The same statement was later read in front of the NationalStruggleMuseum, in other words, the EOKA museum. The statement was as follows:

“Symbols of Shame"

We are standing in front of one of the symbols of shame for humanity and our island;

The system which has created many stories of heroism is trying to brainwash us. Neither Cypriots, nor humanity will ever forgive these gangs who have killed us during the years, when the weapons were stealing our dreams. We should also not forget the bitter truth on our island which no official history book could dare to write about; these gangs not only savagely killed those who they perceived as being on the opposite side, but also those who spoke their own language. Because they betrayed them; yes, they betrayed the weapons, the tanks, the bombs, and they asked for peace. They called them traitors and murdered them without any hesitation or conscience. But we have conscience and like Dervish Kavazoglu and Kostas Mishaoulis who were killed arm in arm, we are betraying war and death. We are rebelling, we are confronting those who say that we should be enemies and we are calling on them to answer to this; aren’t those who kill people for the interests of other countries and for their own petty scores the real traitors? And aren’t they traitors, especially because they betrayed humanity?

Greece gave birth to EOKA and Turkey to TMT for the interests of NATO. In the 1950’s we witnessed motherlands’ compassion. Weapons came from the motherlands, murderers with blood on their hands were trained in their motherlands, and teachers of death, with stars on their shoulders, came to our country to even give lessons. We heard and learnt all these from them, they did not deny it, to the contrary, they bragged about it. Those who could not write their savagery into history books recounted the assistance of their motherlands with pride and arrogance. They killed children who were playing in the street and attending school. And this is why children should not be taken to this kind of places during school excursions, for this reason they should no longer have toy guns, children should not be introduced to bullets.

We defend life and not death. We want to bury weapons and not to live under their shadow. This is the reason for our rebellion. We neither want anyone to give us weapons nor to kill each other, this is what we want. We no longer want to be taught how to kill each other. With flowers in our hands and without bowing, we extend our heads towards the barrels of weapons. We know that the higher we hold our heads the further away we will keep our island from weapons, from war, and of course from death.”

After the statement a carnation was left at the door and the walk went on…

The group which then walked to the
Ledra Street
checkpoint was given information on the historical situation of the military units in the area and on the ceasefire line. It crossed to the southern part of Nicosia went to a guard post behind the “Berlin 2” restaurant manned by a Greek Cypriot soldier. Statements were read here as well. In the statements it was pointed out that in Cyprus absurd things are taking place. The group was informed about the anomalies taking place in Cyprus with the words “As you eat outside someone can keep guard ten meters away; after the checkpoints were opened in 2003, this soldier is facing north looking out for the “enemy” while behind him only ten meters away Turkish and Greek Cypriots can eat kebabs.”

After the National Guard soldier was also handed a carnation, the group continued its journey along the ceasefire line. The group which arrived at the ELDIK Officers’ Club after passing
Solomou Square
, was again informed about the armies in Cyprus and the role of ELDIK in the conflict. Then one of the statements, read earlier in the northern part of Cyprus, titled “the occupation of weapons” was read. Then, the group continued its walk to the NationalStruggleMuseum, also known as the EOKA museum, near the archbishopric palace where the walk ended. Here information was given on the events of the 1950’s and 60’s and the role of the EOKA and TMT members in those events. After this, the statement titled “the symbols of shame” which was earlier read in front of the TMT museum was also read here. The walk ended with these statements…

Meeting the Ministry of Defence in Southern Cyprus

A delegation comprising the president, secretary general and vice president and Cyprus representative of EBCO and our Russian and Serbian member had a 2/hours meeting on 18th May with the officials of the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Cyprus. The military official who participates in the evaluation committee for conscientious objectors was also present at the meeting. The EBCO officials gave information on the international standards and received information on the legal processes and their application in Cyprus. It was reminded to the officials that the application for conscientious objection should be made to a civil institution and to a committee whose members are made up entirely of civilians, the application should not be evaluated according to subjective criteria, that is, no-one should test someone else’s values of conscience, the alternative service should be entirely of civilian nature and it should not be punitive in its length. The EBCO Secretariat stated that the legal procedure in the Republic of Cyprus falls very much behind Council of Europe standards in this respect.

Meeting the Defence Ministry

The secretariat also handed the officials a copy of the joint declaration prepared at last year’s Athens meeting which was at that time given to the Cyprus embassy there as well. As it may be recalled, copies of this declaration were given to the Turkish embassy, the Cyprus embassy in Athens, and to the Greek prime minister’s office on 11th April 2008. (see report on the Athens meeting on this website)
 

 
The meeting, hosted by the Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus, was held at the premises of the Turkish Cypriot Teachers’ Union (KTOS) in northern Nicosia
 
 
Gina Chappa and Murat Kanatli, our hosts in Cyprus
 
Public meeting at the northern part of Cyprus
Militourism in Nicosia
 Nicosia: Turc military camp
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nicosia> Backyard of a southern Cyprus house with a view on the UN controlled zone to the Turc side
 
 
Meeting the Ministry of Defence in Southern Cyprus

     
15 May International CO Day - Press report in Greece  

     
Conscientious Objection events in Cyprus 15 to 17 May 2009  

     
The EBCO Newsletter "The Right to refuse to kill" spring 2009 can be downloaded here!    
     
31st March 2009

Breaking news: Greece again

The Appeal Military Court of Athens (second degree court) today, March 31st 2009, sentenced 46-year-old conscientious objector Lazaros Petromelidis to a 18 months in prison, deeming him guilty on two charges of insubordination. The court finally accepted to suspend the sentence until the hearing in the supreme court (third degree court).

In the first degree court he had been sentenced to a 36-month imprisonment sentence and a 7000 euros bail.

After the third degree court and if Lazaros is again deemed guilty, he can appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.


This was the 16th trial of Lazaros! (to see the EBCO press release
click here!)
   
     
GREECE

EBCO condemns shocking increase of violence in Greece. Meeting of Greek conscientious objectors experienced hand grenade attack on 24 February evening. Participants of the meeting escaped deadly explosion only by lucky circumstances. See report below:

No more military armaments, no more hand grenades
Press release on the hand grenade attack against the Migrants’ House

Athens, 25 February 2009

Yesterday night, Tuesday 24 February, at around 10 pm, and while there was in full progress an open meeting against the new armaments plan, hosted by the Greek Association of Conscientious Objectors, an unknown person threw a hand grenade at the building that the meeting was taking place - the Migrants’ House at 13A Tsamadou Street in Exarchia - and then run away.

Those of us that were inside at the time heard a loud knock at the window and then a strong explosion. The perpetrator tried to throw a hand grenade inside the meeting hall through the window. Fortunately, there was double-glazing and only the outside glass broke, bouncing off the hand grenade into the pavement, just outside the building. >From the explosion, some glass windows in the surrounding buildings were broken and damage was caused in the pavement. But thankfully, and only due to sheer luck, no one was harmed, against, apparently, the clear intention of the perpetrator to kill.

The building known as the Migrants’ House, apart from the Greek Association of Conscientious Objectors, houses a number of left, feminist, homosexual and immigrant groups. A short time before the attack, Greek language courses for non-native speakers were taking place, as every day, attended by tens of immigrants.

The revival of extreme-right or para-state terrorism, which we seem to be witnessing, can frighten only those who are already frightened, therefore not us. As it is obvious and as it happens in such cases, the Greek Association of Conscientious Objectors will continue and intensify its action, especially now that we realize how much this
 

     

Rally in Athens 26 February against the hand grenade attack
GREEK ASSOCIATION OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS
"NO TO FASCISM, NATIONALISM, MILITARISM"

   
     
European Parliament Hearing on Conscientious Objection 22 January 2009

The Sub/committee for Security and Defence of the European Parliament organized a Parliamentarian Hearing on 22 January. Speakers were Johan Galtung, Professor of Peace Studies, Transcend, Oslo, Norway, Peter ROWE, Professor of Law, University of Lancaster, UK and Andreas Speck, War Resisters International, London, UK

Johan Galtung: Nuremberg judgment stated that obedience cannot justify illegal actions. This point needs to be included into the Geneva Convention. There is more a duty for conscientious objection than only a right. He mentioned the withdrawal of Switzerland from ISAF in Afghanistan. They had been invited for a peace keeping mission which turned into a war against the rebels. The UN Charter is making a difference between accepted and non-accepted wars from the point of view of international law. Does a state have the right to kill?

Andreas Speck, WRI mentioned German, Holland and United Kingdom to be the only EU member states that accept conscientious objection for professional solders. Poland does not accept conscientious objection in time of war. A limited number of EU member states accepts conscientious objection during war time. Selective conscientious objection for specific wars is generally not foreseen. Professional soldiers have to refund expenses to the army in case of conscientious objection (Germany) or have not sufficient information (Holland, United Kingdom).

Prof. Peter Rowe, jurist, UK discussed illegal orders and the rights of soldiers to disobey, dealing with situations where a person has become a member of the armed forces. Refusal to obey is often caused by CO. Distinction between the two: subjective belief or objective assessment of the law ex post facto. Importance of obeying orders in a military structure – see also EU Status of Forces Agreement from 2003 on jurisdiction of sending State. Generally the national law will apply for the sent contingent; there is no international body responsible. Further elements: What is an order? - Express, to act or not to act, spoken or written. Unclear orders. No order but act as think commander wishes. Order from civilians and their validity? What is an illegal order? Contrary to national law (acts of omissions). Conformity with national law but contrary to international law. Rules of engagement (RoE). Complex mixture of national law (sending and receiving States). His conclusion: Soldiers are better protected where exist a discipline and culture of obeying the law. Illiteracy of soldiers can create problems to understand orders. Responsibility of soldiers because of superior orders is not a defence. Importance of command responsibility. Importance of carefully prepared RoE

General discussion:

MEP Konrad (D) PPE: how far conscientious objection can go?

MEP Gomez (PT) PSE : where ends the responsibility of someone who gives orders? Which UN convention can apply?

MEP Tobias Pflüger (D) GUE spoke in favour of a new resolution of he European Parliament as the last ones are out of date. Should there a unified European ruling? Should we not regularise conscientious objection within the rules of engagement for EU missions? Attention on CO regulations in candidate countries like Turkey should be given.

Galtung: In the sense of the UN Charter the Iraq war is illegal. (said Kofi Annan).

Speck: The right of Conscientious objection must be part of the adhesion negotiations with Turkey.

Rowe: International legal orders are still not clear enough. A unified status for all EU armies might be difficult to realize as they have to be integrated in national law.

The Sub Committee will produce a White book with recommendations and documents

The Sub Committee received the EBCO Annual report on conscientious objection 2007.

Speeches and EP resolutions from 1989 and 1993 can be found at the website of the Sub Committee:
http://www.europarl.europa.eu

as well as under these links:

CO Resolution1993_en.pdf

Resolution sur l' objection de conscience au Parlement Européen 1993_fr.pdf

KDV Resolution des Europäischen Parlaments 1993_de.pdf


CO Resolution1989_en.pdf

Resolution sur l' objection de conscience au Parlement Européen 1989_fr.pdf

KDV Resolution des Europäischen Parlaments 1989_de.pdf


Andreas Speck (WRI) statement.pdf

Johan Galtung statement.pdf

Peter Rowe Statement.pdf

General question to be followed up: How can we protect military personal to refuse illegal orders.

(own report)
 


CO Poster en.pdf

     
Our wishes for 2009!

It started with a new war against Palestinians and
peace rallies around the world and in Israel


ISRAEL




Protest in Tel Aviv on January 8, 2009 against the aggression in the Gaza strip at the Defense Ministry. "We refuse to fight in Gaza", "Destroying Gaza produces Terror", was written on banners. The reservist organization "Courage to refuse" has published an advertisement on page one in the daily "Haaretz" a day before. Israeli police arrested more than 300 people. Most of the participants have served in the occupied territories. Media report about harsh police reactions against street protest. 225 people are still in jail, most of them Arabs. Karan Manor has been three days in jail because she participated in a sit-in at the air base entrance of Sde Dov "to remind the pilots of their personal responsibilities".

See also the video of Israeli Military Resisters rally from 8 January 2009 in Tel Aviv

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cMs0nai4JQ

Jerusalem Post 12 January 2009
IDF reserve soldier refuses to take part in Gaza operation


An IDF* combat engineering reserve soldier refused to obey an order to enter the Gaza Strip with his fellow soldiers, Channel 10 reported on Monday afternoon. According to the report, the 35-year-old soldier was called for reserve service and took part in training at the Tze'elim base. When he was told that he would soon join the IDF troops fighting Hamas in the Strip, the soldier told his commanders he was not prepared to take part in the Gaza operation, with which he does not agree. After a brief military trial, the commanders sentenced the soldier to 14 days in a military jail, the television channel reported.


*IDF = Israeli Defence Forces

HAARETZ 19 December 2008




Athens - 10 January 2009



Greek Conscientious Objectors rally against the Gaza war
   
     
PRESS RELEASE

CLUSTER BOMB TREATY:
There is good news; but there is also bad news

12 December 2008

On December 3, in Oslo, 92 countries signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions - a legally-binding document - which bans the production, stockpiling, use and export of cluster bombs. It also requires states to provide adequate assistance to victims of these weapons. It has already been ratified by four national legislatures, including Norway, which has also transposed the treaty into national law. The treaty must be ratified by 30 countries before it enters into force.
There is no doubt, this result consists a landmark victory for civil society campaigners. Hundreds of NGOs and survivors of indiscriminate cluster bomb explosions have supported the worldwide campaign and joined the Cluster Munitions Coalition (CMC) which was originally started in 2003.
Nevertheless there is also bad news. The Convention was not signed by the main producers and user of cluster bombs. The outgoing US administration boycotted the negotiations and has refused to sign the treaty. Russia, China, India, Pakistan and Israel - the world's heaviest producers and users of cluster bombs - also stayed out of the Oslo pact, with the US, Russia and China locked in negotiations on who goes first.
The European Union failed to adopt a common position on the Convention. Six Member States, Finland, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Greece and Cyprus did not sign it. Poland, Greece, Romania and Slovakia have produced and stockpiled cluster bombs. Latvia has also stockpiled the weapons, while Cyprus usually follows Greek foreign policy.
The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection, considering the impact of the use of cluster bombs disastrous for the civilian populations, especially the children, urges the six non signing Member States of the European Union to reconsider their attitude and sign the Convention on Cluster Munitions as soon as possible. It also urges them to stop immediately the production, stockpiling and, the eventual, use of such munitions.
The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection, supporting youth that refuse military service, requests from the European Commission and the European Parliament to outlaw the production and stockpiling of these weapons within the European Union once the ban enters into force, making the adoption of the treaty a condition for bilateral cooperation inside and outside the EU with all non signing states and to take all the necessary initiatives, to convince the six recalcitrant Member States to sign the treaty. The threat of use and use of cluster bombs must be refused by soldiers as a crime against humanity.

(PRESS RELEASE:pdf)
   
     
The EBCO Newsletter "The Right to Refuse to Kill" autumn 2008 issue is now online    
     
PUBLIC STATEMENT

on the submission of the 2007 Report on Conscientious Objection in Europe to the Committee for Civil Liberties and Home Affairs of the European Parliament

30 November 2008

In its 2007 report to the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs of the European Parliament, the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection submitted today evidence on the application by the Member States of the European Parliament's resolutions on conscientious objection and civilian service during the calendar year 2007.

The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection reminded the Committee of the Resolution on Conscientious Objection in the Member States of the Community (the Bandrés Molet and Bindi Resolution of 19 January 1994) where the European Parliament «instructs its Committee on Civil Liberties to draw up an annual report on the application by the Member States of its resolutions on conscientious objection and civilian service, and to involve the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection».

The Committee was also reminded of this commitment in a resolution adopted by the Council of Members of the European Youth Forum in Brussels on 9th and 10th November 2007.

As a testimony of the violation of the right to conscientious objection in the European Union, meanwhile recognized also by Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Mr Lazaros Petromelidis, Vice-President of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection and now 16 years under legal persecution by the EU Member State Greece for his conscientious objection to military service, stated: «? hope that before the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which guarantees the right of freedom of conscience, religion and thought, the Committee will take action to request from those Members States which still violate the human rights of conscientious objectors the end of every discrimination in this field and the rehabilitation of the conscientious objectors who have been victims of such a violation».

“The European Union claims as its principle objective to promote the protection of human rights worldwide and should not allow its Member States to continue the non-respect of such rights by itself”, said Ms Alexia Tsouni, Secretary General of the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection after meeting, together with Mr Lazaros Petromelidis, the Chairman of the Committee Mr Gérard Deprez n Brussels to submit the above-mentioned report.

The full text of the report here
   
     
On the occasion of the EBCO Board meeting 22 November in Brussels, Vice-President was interviewed by the Belgium daily “Libre Belgique”.

   
     
October

TURKEY

Dear Friends,

I would like to draw attention to a
new conscientious objector in Turkey. His name is Fatih Karayay. As we have corresponded with Gerd in previous mails, he has been in the condition of a draft evader for many years, he ignored the calls to military, very much like thousands of draft evaders in the country. However, he is fed up with being an evader for he cannot integrate himself into social security scheme, he cannot do a proper registered job, etc.

He declared his conscientious objection last Friday – 10 October 2008 - in Ankara and was immediately taken under custody by the police. The police talked to him for a few hours, trying to convince him to change his mind, and then they released him on condition that he will submit to the military unit in Tokat on Wednesday, Oct. 15. I have been contacting him for a week. He plans to go to Tokat, to the military unit next week. There he will declare his conscientious.objection once more, after he submits to the military. Then expectedly, the same vicious cycle of military court - military prison will follow. However, it is not easy to say what exactly will happen because lately the army has started to use a mechanism to bypass the issue; which is giving the CO an health report declaring the person 'psychosocially unfit for military' (whatever this 'psychosocially unfit' means is quite unclear). They have used this sort of report in the cases of Halil Savda and Mehmet Bal. The court cases about these people are not closed, but they have been released from prison.

He is supported mainly by the Human Rights Association (I.HD), and they provide lawyers to him. He is asking for international support; and I wanted to communicate his demand to you. What sort of a treatment he will face, we will see after he goes to the military unit. I will keep posting any information on his case.

Best Regards,
Feyda
 

     
JEAN-JACQUES DE FELICE

Our friend Jean-Jacques de Felice has passed away. As Vice-President of the Human Rights League (LDH) he was, after Jean Gauchon, the main barrister for conscientious objectors. He defended dozens of conscientious objectors and absentee soldiers. He was an eminent member of the Pacifist Union (UPF) and always took part in our meetings, bringing to them his active participation and enthusiastic support. He was also President of the Comité Louis Lecoin for supporting the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection. We could always count on him for a legal opinion or for a trial. How many times have we called on him to defend a conscientious objector? He himself called on us when he needed a witness for an isolated conscientious objector.

Nor will we forget the UPF, represented by our Secretary Therèse Collet, who faced a trial in 1977 for sticking up posters with drawings by Cabu that were considered insulting to the army. This was a truly anti-militarist court case, with important witnesses, notably Maurice Laisant, Henri Rosier and Theodore Monod. Jean-Jacques had invited two other barristers, including one from England who appeared in his wig! That gave the trial an international dimension. He defended Larzac, and also defended those without papers. Some people were surprised to see this non-violent man defending former terrorists, in particular Nathalie Menigon: the French government should keep to its commitments.

He was known at an international level for his appearances in other countries, notably in Madrid during the Franco era, in Athens during the time of the colonels and in Tahiti and Nouméa in the OverseasTerritories; he was there to defend great causes. During the Algerian war he defended both the FLN (National Liberation Front) and the conscientious objectors. He was also often asked to give talks and lectures in favour of pacifism and non-violence.

It was Jean-Jacques de Felice, together with Louis Joinet (Frances’s representative at the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva), who, at the request of Maurois, formed the working group to put forward proposals for the new law on conscientious objection in 1983. Groups of conscientious objectors and the movements that supported them were represented. He was always present, and combined his legal skills with his commitment to human rights, his pacifist convictions, his compassion for the victims of injustice and his friendship for activists. He had moral authority in respect of institutions and, simultaneously, the complete confidence of those whom he defended.

Nearly three hundred people, in spite of the summer holidays, were present at the Père LachaiseCemetery to pay him their last respects. Former conscientious objectors whom he had defended were there, as were representatives of associations, members of the LDH and of CIMADE; colleagues were also there, activists from Larzac came up to Paris, and a former member of the FLN came specially from Algiers. Our friend Lucio lent us his room so that we could get together after the ceremony.

We will always be grateful to Jean-Jacques for having defended conscientious objectors and for allowing our convictions to be recognised.
 


Photo from 1990


photo from 2006

Many thanks to "Archives audiovisuelles de la BDIC"

     
July 2008

Turkish ministry of justice - a motion to relax pressure on Conscientious Objectors?

Turkish Ministry of Justice has published an circular which orders that draft evaders are no longer seized by recruiting offices. According to the circular, recruiting offices no longer have the authority to take evaders into custody; in order to take an evader into custody, a judge’s decision will be required. Moreover, the circular states that evaders who serve their sentences for evading; will not be taken to Recruiting Office, but will be expected to go to the Office by himself.

The circular by Ministry of Justice, which makes references to the European Convention on Human Rights, has been circulated among the prosecutors’ offices. Details of the circular are as follows:

Draft evaders will not be searched for or taken into custody upon demands of recruiting offices.

Only the prosecutors can call an order to take an evader under custody.

If the Prosecutor’s Office decides that there is no need for further prosecution, evaders will not be arrested or taken into custody.

If and when the accused party is declared guilty and receives punishment (either in terms of prison sentences or fines) according to the Military Penal Code, after execution of the sentence, the person will not be taken to a Recruiting Office.

The Recruiting Offices will have no authority to oppose to the Prosecutor’s judgement. The judgement will be sent to the presidency of related recruiting Office only for the purpose of informing.

This circular carries positive implications for conscientious objectors in Turkey: First of all, conscientious objectors will be judged in civilian courts for draft evasion; unless an objector declares his objection after starting military service. Secondly, after they serve the sentence upon a civilian court’s judgement, they will not be taken and handed in to Recruiting Offices.

This circular is not a recognition of the right to conscientious objection. However, apparently it is potentially a measure in the way of relaxing the pressure on conscientious objectors.

Best Wishes, Feyda Sayan
   
     
"The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Halil Savda was arbitrary"t

the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention concluded on 20 July 2008 on Turkish CO Halil Savda's repeated imprisonment in its statement to the Turkish government.

"The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Halil Savda during the periods between 16 and 28 December 2004, between 7 December 2006 and 2 February 2007, as well as between 5 February and 28 July 2007 was arbitrary. His deprivation of liberty since 27 March 2008 is also arbitrary, being in contravention of articles 9 and 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and of articles 9 and 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights from which the Republic of Turkey is a State Party, falling under category II of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases submitted to the Working Group. In addition, it also falls under category III of the categories applied by the Working Group, as far as Mr. Savda would have to serve his prison term following his conviction by judgement No. 2007/742-396."

Here the link to the full pdf document
   
     
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL - PUBLIC STATEMENT

AI Index: EUR 25/003/2008 (Public)
Date: 20 June 2008

Greece: Lazaros Petromelidis repeatedly convicted for his beliefs
 

© Amnesty International

Lazaros Petromelidis

     
Turkey

article318-poster en.pdf
   
     
GREECE

On 20 May, Greek conscientious objector Lazaros Petromelidis was again sentenced in absentia to three years imprisonment without suspension on two charges of insubordination by the Naval Court of Piraeus. This means that after this trial, his 15th one, there is again an arrest warrant for Lazaros Petromelidis, and he is in imminent danger of imprisonment for his beliefs.
Lazaros Petromelidis' case has a long history of 16 years, full of prosecutions and convictions. He was first prosecuted after he declared his conscientious objection in March 1992, at a time when Greece did not recognize the right to conscientious objection. In 1998 he refused to do the alternative service he was offered, as it was of an extremely punitive duration -- in his case, seven and a half times longer than the military service he would otherwise have had to perform. Since then, he has been regularly receiving call-up papers to serve in the military and has been repeatedly charged with insubordination because of his refusal, as a conscientious objector, to do military service. He has been passed through more than a dozen trials and has been imprisoned three times, in May 1998, April 1999 and September 2002.
Lazaros Petromelidis (45) is holding a world record on punishments for his conscientious objection to military service. He has been on trial for refusing to enlist in the Greek army 15 times since his 30th birthday, has been sentenced to imprisonment several times and has been banned from traveling abroad. He is ending his conscription age at the end of this year but may be called up again until the 31st of December 2008. His repeated punishment for the same offence is in contradiction to the Ne Bis in Idem principle in Article 14 paragraph 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: "No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country."
EBCO and War Resisters' International call for the suspension of Lazaros Petromelidis' sentence.
The right to conscientious objection is a legitimate exercise of the fundamental right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 18), the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Article 18), the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Article 9) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Article 10).
EBCO calls on people to send protest letters to: Mr. Kostas Karamanlis, Prime Minister of Greece Maximos Mansion ('Megaro Maximou') 19, Herodou Attikou str. GR-106 74 Athens (info@primeminister.gr). Please inform also your Members of the European Parliament and ask them to intervene at the Greek government.
Meanwhile an intervention at the Chairman of the Committee for Liberties, Justice and home affairs at the European Parliament Gérard Deprez (Belgium) to take actions to protect Article 10 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
You find further information on Lazaros Petromelidis' on this website.
 


Lazaros Petromelidis

     
Brussels, 15 May 2008 - Press Release

15 May, International Conscientious Objectors’ Day
Turkey should stop persecuting conscientious objectors to military service

Since November 2006, the young Turkish conscientious objector, Halil Savda, sentenced to 21 months’ imprisonment, guilty of refusing to carry out his military service, has been in and out of prison for a total of 9 months.It is important to remember that Turkey, in spite of judgements by the European Court of Human Rights and orders by the Council of Europe, has still not legislated for the status of conscientious objectors, nor made any provision for alternative civilian service.

Many objectors who refuse to serve in uniform, just as those people and associations who support them, find themselves regularly behind bars. They are charged with “damaging national power” and “disobeying orders”. For these crimes the penal code prescribes 4 to 5 years’ imprisonment.

A military court recently judged that Halil Savda was unfit to serve in the army for reasons of “socially disturbed personality”. In spite of this, he has not been set free, but merely transferred from the military prison to the civil prison in Çorlu, where he may still have to remain for some 10 months.

CNAPD, the Christian Peace Movement (MCP) and the European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO), deeply concerned by the attacks on freedom of conscience in Turkey, on the day consecrated around the world to the recognition of conscientious objection, demand from the Turkish authorities:

The immediate release of Halil Savda;

An end to administrative humiliation and harassment and to ostracism of conscientious objectors who have already served their sentences;

The establishment of a civilian service to replace military service, as recommended by the Council of Europe, of which Turkey is a member.

Turkey, moreover, as a candidate country for membership of the European Union (EU), must recognise the right to conscientious objection to military service, which is one of the fundamental human rights of the EU. EBCO strives for the recognition of this right at the level of European institutions.

EBCO’s website: http://www.ebco-beoc.org

Contact: Carla Goffi / Email:
mcp.belgium@skynet.be

Telephone: +32 (0) 496463965

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruxelles, le 15 Mai 2008 - Communiqué de presse

15 mai, journée internationale consacrée à l’objection de conscience :

La Turquie doit cesser les persécutions à l’encontre des objecteurs de conscience au service militaire

Depuis Novembre 2006 , le jeune objecteur de conscience turc Halil Savda, condamné à 21 mois d’incarcération, coupable de refuser de prester son service militaire, sort et rentre en prison pour un total de 9 mois.
Rappelons que la Turquie, en dépit des condamnations de la Cour Européenne des droits de l’homme et des injonctions du Conseil de l’Europe, n’a toujours pas légiféré sur le statut d’objecteur de conscience, ni prévu de service civil de remplacement.

Les nombreux objecteurs qui refusent de servir sous les drapeaux, ainsi que les personnes et associations qui les soutiennent, se trouvent régulièrement derrière les barreaux. Ils sont poursuivis pour ‘dommage au pouvoir national’ et ‘désobéissance aux ordres’.

Le code pénal prévoit, pour ces enfreintes, de 4 à 5 ans d’emprisonnement.

Halil Savda a récemment été jugé par le tribunal militaire inapte à prester dans l’armée, pour des raisons de ‘personnalité socialement dérangée’. Il n’a pas, pour autant, été libéré mais transféré de la prison militaire à celle civile de Çorlu, où il risque de purger encore une dizaine de mois.

Le CNAPD et le Mouvement Chrétien pour la Paix (MCP) et le Bureau Européen de l’Objection de Conscience (BEOC), fort préoccupés par les graves atteintes à la liberté de conscience en Turquie, en ce jour consacré mondialement à la reconnaissance de l’objection de conscience, demandent aux autorités turques :

La libération immédiate de Halil Savda ;

L’arrêt des vexations, tracasseries administratives et ostracisme à l’encontre des objecteurs de conscience qui ont déjà purgé leurs peines ;

La mise en place d’un service civil de remplacement au militaire, conformément aux recommandations du Conseil de l’Europe dont fait partie la Turquie.

La Turquie, comme pays candidat à l’adhésion à l’UE, a d’ailleurs l’obligation de reconnaître le droit à l’objection de conscience au service militaire, qui est un est des droits de l’homme fondamentaux de l’UE.

Le BEOC œuvre pour la reconnaissance de ce droit au niveau des institutions européennes .

Site web du BEOC : http://www.ebco-beoc.org/

Personne de contact : Carla Goffi
mcp.belgium@skynet.be tel ; 0496463965
 


Halil Savda

     
CYPRUS : The Initiative for Conscientious Objection - Cyprus has celebrated International Conscientious Objectors' Day on May 15th with a demonstration and a press-conference in front of the Army Recruitment Center in northern part of Nicosia

Conscience is needed for peace...

The Initiative for Conscientious Objection - Cyprus has celebrated International Conscientious Objectors' Day on May 15th with a demonstration and a press-conference in front of the Army Recruitment Center in northern part of Nicosia. The main theme was "Our duty for our homeland is peace and Conscientious Objection is our right". The particular location was chosen because that is where all the paperwork, health checks etc for the compulsory military service takes place. The demonstrators called for legislation for the right of conscientious objection in the Turkish occupied areas. Furthermore, they have pointed out that in both sides of the island, young people are trained to use deadly weapons and are asked to keep guard against each other. This is an unacceptable and unnecessary situation. The lack of the right of conscientious objection forces the youth, who either refuses or can not do the military service, to leave the island and never return back. The whole idea of the military service goes against the basic desire of the youth for reunification and peace in the island.

General Aims, Principles and an Open Call
of The Initiative for Conscientious Objection - Cyprus

Military service ’in the northern part of Cyprus from The Right to Refuse to Kill - The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection Newsletter - Summer 2006 pdf format of newsletter

read also: http://militarizmi.reddet.org/8e.htm
 

     
Greek Section of Amnesty International

Association of Greek Conscientious Objectors

Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus (north)

European Bureau for Conscientious Objection

War Resisters' International

To the
Embassy of Turkish Republic, Athens
Embassy of the Republic of Cyprus, Athens
Prime Minister of Greece, Athens

Athens, 11 April 2008

Greece, Cyprus and Turkey to recognise international standards on the right to conscientious objection

Representatives of conscientious objection and human rights organisations from several European countries, meeting in Athens over the weekend, call for Greece, Cyprus and Turkey to recognise the right to conscientious objection according to European and international standards.

The representatives remind the governments of Greece, Cyprus and Turkey that the right to conscientious objection has been recognised by several international institutions, among others the United Nations[
1] and the Council of Europe[2]. More specifically, in a decision on two individual complaints from South Korea, the United Nations Human Rights Committee ruled in 2007 that not to provide for the right to conscientious objection is a violation of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion[3].

In detail:

Although Greece provides in its law 3421/2005 for the right to conscientious objection, the law itself and its implementation do not meet international standards. The Ministry of Defence and not a civilian authority decides on applications for conscientious objection, an application is only possible within strict time limits, and thus not for serving soldiers or reservists, and the alternative service of conscientious objectors is almost twice the length of military service, which is punitive. In addition, in recent years the majority of non-religious conscientious objectors have been rejected by the Ministry of Defence, and several conscientious objectors still face prosecution

The situation regarding the right to conscientious objection is very different in the two parts of Cyprus. While the Republic of Cyprus recognises the right to conscientious objection for conscripts, an application has to be made to the Ministry of Defence, and not to a civilian authority. The right is also not available to serving conscripts or professional soldiers. In the northern part of Cyprus the right to conscientious objection is not recognised at all. All military matters are directly controlled by the Turkish military.

Turkey too does not recognise the right to conscientious objection. Conscientious objectors face a life in illegality and/or repeated imprisonment. Conscientious objector Halil Savda has been arrested again on 27 March 2008, after having been released on 28 July 2007, following the completion of a sentence of six months of imprisonment on charges of continued disobedience. He now has to serve an outstanding prison sentence of 15.5 months on charges of desertion, and will also face a new trial on new charges of desertion.

The repeated punishment of conscientious objectors in Turkey violates Article 14 paragraph 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: "No one shall be liable to be tried or punished again for an offence for which he has already been finally convicted or acquitted in accordance with the law and penal procedure of each country"[
4]. Furthermore, the European Court of Human Rights decided in January 2006 in the case of CO Osman Murat Ülke that the Turkish practice of repeated imprisonment amounts to a “civil death”and a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights[5].

Although the details differ from country to country, all three countries are “united” in their violation of the right to conscientious objection, and in their refusal to accept the freedom of conscience according to European and international standards. We, representatives from conscientious objection and human rights organisations from European countries, including Greece, Cyprus, and Turkey, therefore call on these governments to finally comply with those human rights treaties all three countries are part of, and to finally recognise the right to conscientious objection according to those standards, without any “buts”and restrictions.

Signatories:
Greek Section of Amnesty International, Association of Greek Conscientious Objectors, Initiative for Conscientious Objection in Cyprus (north), European Bureau for Conscientious Objection, War Resisters' International.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1998), Resolution 1998/77: Conscientious Objection to Military Service and subsequent resolutions in 2000, 2002 and 2004

[2] Council of Europe (1987), Recommendation No. R (87) 8 of the Committee of Ministers

[3] Human Rights Committee, CCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004, 23 January 2007

[4] Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: Opinion No 36/1999 (TURKEY), Opinion No 24/2003 (ISRAEL). See also Human Rights Committee: General Comment No 32, CCPR/C/GC/32, 23 August 2007

[5] AFFAIRE ÜLKE v. TURQUIE, Requête no 39437/98, 24 January 2006
   
     
Fax

To: M. Lluís Maria de PUIG
President of the CoE Parliamentary Assembly
Plaza de la Marina Espanola 8, 28071, Madrid, Spain
Tel: +34 91 538 1000 / Fax: +34 91 538 1015


Subject: Investigation of reports of intimidation and ill-treatment

17 April 2008

Dear Mr. President,

I would like to bring to your attention the following press release which
EBCO issued after the alleged intimidation and ill-treatment of Turkish
conscientious objector Ismail Saygi. We urge you to launch an immediate
investigation into this case and make the findings public. Thank you in
advance.

Yours sincerely,
Alexia Tsouni

Secretary General
European Bureau for Conscientious Objection FAX

To: Mr. José LELLO

President of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly

3, Place du Petit Sablon, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

Tel: +32 2 513 2865 / Fax: +32 2 514 1847


Subject: Investigation of reports of intimidation and ill-treatment

17 April 2008

Dear Mr. President,

I would like to bring to your attention the following press release which
EBCO issued after the alleged intimidation and ill-treatment of Turkish
conscientious objector Ismail Saygi. We urge you to launch an immediate
investigation into this case and make the findings public. Thank you in
advance.
Yours sincerely,
Alexia Tsouni

Secretary General

European Bureau for Conscientious Objection

PRESS RELEASE
Arrest and intimidation of Turkish conscientious objectors

16 April 2008

The European Bureau for Conscientious Objection (EBCO) held its annual
meeting in Athens on 12 April with representatives of 14 European countries:
Turkey, Cyprus, Russia, France, Spain, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands,
Bulgaria, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Sweden, Greece, Macedonia.

The assembly protested against the arrest of the Turkish conscientious
objector Halil Savda in Istanbul on 27 March during a solidarity meeting for
the imprisoned objector Ismail Saygi.

“We expect a respectful treatment of the young Turkish human rights defender
and the respect of his conscientious conviction which forbids his
participation in military service”, explained EBCO’s President Gerd GREUNE.
Halil Savda already spent several months in military prison, and has been
sentenced repeatedly on charges of "persistent disobedience" or "desertion".

Furthermore the assembly expressed its outrage about reports that the young
conscript Ismail Saygi has been badly treated and beaten while detained in
his military unit and was so much intimidated that he withdrew his
declaration as conscientious objector. “The Turkish authorities and
international bodies like the Council of Europe and NATO should investigate
these cases”, said EBCO’s President. It is not acceptable that a 19 year old
youngster is arrested and forced to give up his right to the freedom of
conscience by military force.
   
     
TURKEY: Conscientious objector Halil Savda arrested again

Turkish conscientious objector Halil Savda was arrested again on 27 March 2008, during a solidarity demonstration for imprisoned conscientious objector Ismail Saygi. Halil Savda read a statement in the name of the Solidarity Initiative for Saygi, saying: "Based on our own painful experiences we worry about the possibility that Saygi will be targeted by the random pressures and restrictions, disciplinary punishments and torture that conscientious objectors are exposed to in military prisons." Soon after, he was taken into custody by police, because of an outstanding arrest warrant on charges of desertion. Halil Savda already spent several months in military prison, and has been sentenced repeatedly on charges of "persistent disobedience" or "desertion". (see further messages on this site below)
 


Halil Savda

     
Turkish Conscientious Objector Arrested

Conscientious objector Ismail Saygi, who was taken into custody on 16 March, has been arrested.

Aftter serving seven months of his military service, Ismail Saygi declared on 15 November 2006 that he wanted to become a conscientious objector.
He was taken into custody on Sunday, 16 March, and has now been arrested in Istanbul. Because he was registered as a deserter, an arrest warrant
had been issued against him in his absence. Saygi was first handed over to the military police in Üsküdar, and then, after appearing in front of a military
prosecutor, taken to Maltepe military prison in Istanbul. Saygi is expected to be transferred to a military prison in Sarikamis, in the east of Turkey.

An Initiative for Solidarity with Ismail Saygi has been formed starting public actions on 19 March at Galatasaray Highschool in Taksim, central Istanbul,
to show solidarity with conscientious objection and to start a support campaign.

Bianet News, 19 March 2008
   
     

A Turkish translation of the Council of Europe brochure has been produced by EBCO and is now available here: "Mecburî askerlik hizmetine karþý vicdanî retçilik"

   
     
Friedhelm Schneider,
EBCO Representative to the Council of Europe has written an article in French language on the development of conscientious objection and alternative service in Germany which you can find at this link.
 


Friedhelm Schneider

     
CO situation in Russia

Military Draft Conscripts
called up
Alternative Civil Service: applications (servicemen) Have not been called for any reason
Spring 2006 124 550 Full year 319 (275) Every year: approximately 2/3 of all conscripts are not called up because of deferrals, exemptions, healthy reasons, etc
Autumn 2006 123 310 Full year 319 (275)
Spring 2007 133 500 227 (97)
Autumn 2007 132 350 184 (unknown)

Remark
:
2006 was the last year of the military service term with 24 months.

The reduction of the term of the military service as well as of the civil service is planned for 2007-2008.

In 2007 the term consists of 18 months, from 2008 it is expected to be of 12 months.

The same regards to the alternative civil service. 2004-2007 – 42 months; 2007 – 31,5 months, from 2008 it is expected to be of 21 months.



Table of the situation of military service and conscientious objection in the Council of Europe member states

Council of Europe member state Conscription (no more conscription since... Duration of compulsory military service Right to conscientious objection since Duration of alternative service
Russia Yes In 2007 –

18 months, from 2008 – 12 months
1992 – in the Constitution of the SovietFederal
Republic of Russia. 1993 – in the modern Constitution of the RF
In 2007 –
31,5 months,
from 2008 – 21 months


Source: Andrey Kalikh, Moscow
   
     
Our Mission

EBCO's principal aim is to promote conscientious objection to a military service as a fundamental human right. This includes the proper national legislation as well as international binding guidelines. EBCO It serves as a network and umbrella organization for national CO-organizations all over Europe. Currently, more than thirty organizations from more than twenty countries participate. Besides exchanging information and experience, keeping members, politicians and interested people updated are our main tasks. Another focus lies on lobbying European institutions in favor of the right to conscientious objection.

EBCO has consultative status with the Council of Europe (please click
here for contact information of our delegate) and also works together with the European Parliament. In addition, EBCO is a member of the European Youthforum.
   
     
Contact Information

The International Secretariat, EBCO's headquarters, is located in Brussels, sharing office with our partner organizations IFIAS and AVSO. You can reach the International Secretariat from Monday through Friday under following address.
Below you can also find the contact information our representative to the Council of Europe and our account information.

Telephone: +32 2 2306813
Fax: +32 (2) 245 62 97
Address: 61 Rue Henri Stacquet, B-1030 Brussels, Belgium
Electronic mail: Info and Webmaster: ebco@ebco-beoc.eu
How to find us in Brussels: click here for access map (.pdf)
   
     
EBCO Delegate to the Council of Europe

Representative: Friedhelm Schneider
Telephone: +49 (0) 62 32 6 71 50
Fax: +49 (0) 62 32 67 15 67
Address: Große Himmelsgasse 3, D-67346 Speyer, Germany
Electronic mail: ebco@ebco-beoc.eu

Account Information

Owner and account number: EBCO Account 001-1076165-26
Bank and location: FORTIS BANQUE Bruxelles
IBAN: BE59 0011 0761 6526
BIC: GEBABEBB
   
     
     
     

[back to top]

   
     

ebco@ebco-beoc.eu

Copyright ©  EBCO - European Bureau for Conscientious Objection - All Rights Reserved